Case Results for Attorneys Only
Personal Injury Referral Fees
| For the fee from |
Your Share |
| $1 to $50,000 |
27% |
| $50,001 to $100,000 |
31% |
| $100,001 to $250,000 |
36% |
| $250,001 to $500,000 |
40% |
| $500,001 up |
50% |
We have the staff (18) and money to wage war against insurance companies. Bring us in as co-counsel so we can team up for your clients.
The schedule above applies to cases with liability and collectability. Does not apply to capped cases.
Note: The following actual results are presented only to licensed attorneys for the express purpose of evaluating the past performance of The Law Firm when making case referral decisions. Non-attorneys must not view this page as it contains information not authorized for public disclosure by the State Bar of Texas.
The Law Firm-through working its tail off and its relentless determination to obtain what is right for its clients-has achieved extraordinary results. The Law Firm can boast that it is the only firm in Fort Worth to obtain two nine-figure Tarrant County jury verdicts for an injury to a single individual.
The Law Firm received national attention in 1993 as the result of Chuck Noteboom's $102,000,000 jury verdict against State Farm Insurance Company for bad faith refusal to pay a $20,000 claim to one of its policyholders. This verdict remains one of the largest jury verdicts of its kind today.
In 1998, Chuck Noteboom recorded a $250,000,000 jury verdict against a nursing home for mistreatment of an elderly resident. It was argued favorably to a jury that not only should the facility compensate the family for treatment the resident received, but that the company should be required to pay punitive damages for its behavior. The nursing home is no longer in business.
The following are some examples of cases The Law Firm has handled:
- $250,000,000 Nursing home Tarrant County verdict against H.E.B. Nursing Home
- $102,000,000 Tarrant County verdict against State Farm for the bad faith handling of an insurance claim.
- $54,250,000 Tarrant County verdict in a products liability case against General Motors (served as local counsel).
- $16,100,000 Personal injury verdict for a worker who fell from a roof in a construction accident.
- $9,000,000 Jury verdict against construction company for fall by a laborer in a construction accident.
- $5,000,000 Personal injury case involving a trucking accident with a fatality.
- $4,900,000 Stowers case against Nationwide/Scottsdale Insurance Company with $1M in coverage.
- $4,100,000 Products Liability settlement for a defective tire.
- $3,300,000 Jury verdict for death of a man killed by a train at Alliance Airport, against American Airlines, affirmed by Court of Appeals.
- $3,000,000 Settlement for wrongful death (statutory cap at the time was $1.55 million) for the death of patient with a misdiagnosed heart attack against one of the largest hospital chains in Texas. The Law Firm utilized a targeted advertising campaign to uncover witnesses to this event.
- $3,000,000 received by client, after attorney’s fees and medical bills, in a fall from Highway 10.
- $2,875,000 Settlement after a construction accident.
- $2,800,000 Tarrant County verdict for the bad faith handling of an insurance claim by Liberty Mutual, affirmed by Court of Appeals.
- $2,200,000 Personal injury settlement for loss of an eye due to fireworks (served as local counsel).
- $1,900,000 Verdict against Cigna Insurance for mishandling insured's claim.
- $1,875,000 Personal injury settlement involving collision with garbage truck.
- $1,575,000 Wrongful death settlement resulting from automobile collision.
- $1,500,000 Personal Injury settlement involving collision with gravel truck. The police report had found plaintiff totally at fault.
- $1,250,000 Personal injury settlement for an adult drowning at a Lincoln Properties apartment complex.
- $1,200,000 Arbitration award for breach of fiduciary duty to shareholder.
- $1,000,000 Wrongful death claim resulting from truck collision in Pennsylvania.
- $1,000,000 Personal injury settlement arising from nursing home negligence.
- $1,000,000 Personal injury settlement for Travis County vehicle accident.
- $1,000,000 Settlement regarding negligence is failing to disclose information about adoption.
- $1,000,000 Personal injury settlement against a swimming pool company for a diving accident.
- $975,000 Personal injury settlement when nursing home negligence caused a resident to suffer a broken hip.
- $940,000 Personal injury settlement for the death a child in a swimming pool accident.
- $925,000 Verdict in Dallas Federal Court for eye injury against Redi-Mix, LP (offer before trial was $125,000).
- $895,000 Uninsured motorist claim arising from a knee injury.
- $862,500 Personal injury settlement for nursing home negligence.
- $850,000 Nursing home settlement for resident who wandered away from a facility in 1990.
- $850,000 Settlement on $500,000 policy for the City of Pelican Bay for a 1983 case involving a police shooting.
- $750,000 Sexual abuse by an apartment complex janitor.
- $750,000 Settlement after two days in trial in El Paso Federal Court for motorcycle accident (offer before trial was $200K).
- $700,000 Psychiatric hospital malpractice settlement for failing to disclose information.
- $700,000 Personal injury settlement on a $50,000 Farmers Insurance policy (Stowers) Bexar County.
- $550,000 Insurance coverage dispute in Federal Court.
- $500,000 Bad faith settlement with insurance company.
- $480,000 Bad faith settlement with Farmers Insurance post jury verdict and appeal.
- $443,000 Personal injury arising from inadequate security at shopping center.
As you know, the facts of each case are unique and the results in each case will vary. The results above cannot be used to predict the results in your particular case. Indeed, The Law Firm does not guarantee or promise a certain result in any case. The Law Firm works primarily from cases referred by other lawyers, and we welcome the opportunity to visit with you about your case.
DISCLAIMER: The results are specific to the facts and legal circumstances of each of the clients' cases and should not be used to form an expectation that the same results could be obtained for other clients in similar matters without reference to the specific factual and legal circumstances of each client's case.
Sexual Abuse and Assaults
back to top